What Were the Sleaze Movies in the Drive-In Called? A Look at Exploitation Cinema
The term "sleaze movies" conjures up images of dimly lit drive-ins, hushed whispers, and films pushing the boundaries of what was considered acceptable on screen. While there wasn't one single, universally accepted title for these films, they fell under a variety of genres and descriptive terms, often reflecting their provocative content. Understanding what these films were called requires exploring the era and the types of movies shown.
The golden age of drive-in theaters, roughly from the 1950s to the 1980s, saw a flourishing of exploitation films. These weren't always explicitly labeled "sleaze," but the suggestive titles and marketing often hinted at their content. Let's delve into some common categories and the kind of titles you might have seen emblazoned on the drive-in marquee:
What genres were typically considered "sleaze" at drive-ins?
Several genres regularly populated drive-in screens and were often considered "sleaze" by contemporary standards:
-
Nudie Cutie Films: These featured mostly nude or semi-nude women, often in beach settings or vaguely connected narratives. Titles frequently included suggestive language or emphasized the female form, although they were rarely explicitly titled "Sleaze." Think along the lines of descriptive titles highlighting locations or suggestive poses.
-
Sexploitation Films: This genre focused more explicitly on sexual content, sometimes with minimal plot. Titles often used suggestive wordplay or hinted at taboo subjects. These were more likely to be advertised with a degree of mystery, leaving some of the content ambiguous to attract audiences.
-
Horror and Exploitation: Many horror films of the era, especially those with low budgets, blended elements of gore and sex, making them fall under the "sleaze" umbrella for many viewers. Titles often employed shock value and sensationalism.
-
B-Movies and Grindhouse Films: This broader category encompassed a vast array of low-budget films, many of which featured exploitation elements. The titles were often sensationalistic and designed to grab attention, relying on suggestive imagery and provocative language.
Were there specific keywords or phrases used in titles?
While there wasn't a single keyword, certain themes and phrasing were common in titles designed to attract an audience seeking this type of content:
-
Words implying nudity or sexuality: Titles sometimes alluded to nudity or sexual content through subtle wordplay or suggestive imagery.
-
Location-based titles: Titles often highlighted a location, such as a beach or resort, creating an association with escapism and potentially illicit activities.
-
Intriguing, mysterious titles: Some titles aimed to pique interest without explicitly revealing the content, relying on mystery and suggestion.
Why weren't they explicitly called "sleaze movies"?
The term "sleaze" is a retrospective label. At the time, these films were often marketed with euphemisms and suggestive titles to avoid censorship and attract audiences while remaining somewhat ambiguous. Directly calling them "sleaze" might have been seen as too crass or off-putting.
What kind of marketing techniques were used to advertise these films?
Marketing was crucial to the success of exploitation films. Drive-in theaters often used eye-catching posters, trailers, and marquee announcements with suggestive images and tagline. The aim was to create intrigue and draw audiences in with the promise of something forbidden.
In conclusion, while there wasn't a single term like "sleaze movie" used consistently on drive-in marquees, the titles and marketing strategies reflected the provocative and often taboo nature of the films. The suggestive language, imagery, and ambiguous phrasing created a specific appeal for a segment of the audience seeking a more risqué cinematic experience. The specifics of the titles varied greatly, reflecting the diverse subgenres and creative approaches of the filmmakers involved.
